Keywords: Advance directive, uncertainty, conflict anxiety
Background:
Advance directives represent a strong societal debate, and improving its completion rate a subject of interest. After the identification of barriers from specific populations accomplished by the ER 7479 SPURBO, a question occurs: does any transverse and invariant barrier for writing and carrying out advance directives exist?
Research questions:
Method:
To resolve the question, a pragmatic approach inspired by the Grounded Theory had been chosen. It combined a set of systematic reviews of the literature and qualitative studies previously done by the EA-7479-SPURBO used as datas. A conceptual model, resulting from the synthesis of all this research, was produced to answer the research question.
Results:
Eleven open codes, three sub themes had been spotted, gathered under an invariant and transversal theme: the conflict anxiety, which represented a transversal barrier as the research question asked.
As a way to understand the mechanism of this barrier, a conceptual model was proposed. Eleven accessible and empirical elements acted in a synergic way to irrigate three theoretical concepts (Altered confidence, advance directive’s viability, leading to a change in behaviour) improving uncertainty. By doing so, the three concepts gave access to the core of the conceptual model, the conflict anxiety.
Conclusions:
By submitting this, it allowed a broader vision of the advance directive’s concept and may allow a better comprehension of that barrier standing against the application of advance directive, and so for every person involved.
Points for discussion:
Are you confronted with advance directives in your respective countries?
Do you think that this question should be harmonized in europe? and do you think it is possible?